xingchen

Q - say is the President feeling our pain, primarily as you were a community organizer -

THE PRESIDENT: I ​​- see, I definitely feel folks' ache.
Somebody is act a writing about the 10 letters that I get each daytime, and they came by to talk to me yesterday. And they said, what's the overwhelming impression that you get when you read these 10 letters a day Chris Bosh Jersey, and what I told them is I'm so inspired by the strength and resilience of the American people, yet occasionally I'm also just frustrated by the digit of people out there who are struggling, and you want to assist each unattached 1 individually. You nearly feel favor you want to be a case laborer and just start electing up the call and advocating for each of these people who are working hard, attempting to do right by their families; oftentimes, through no fault of their own, they've had a tough period, especially over these last couple of years.

So, yeah, it's frustrating. But my job is to determine that we're focused over the long term: Where is it that we need to go? And the maximum important thing I can do as President is determine that we're living within our means, getting a budget that is sustainable Dwyane Wade Jersey, providing in the future and growing the economy. If I do that, then that's probably the maximum help I can give to the most number of people.

Jake Tapper.

Q ; Thanks, Mr. President. House Republicans, as you know, want to start cutting now, want to start cutting this year's budget. Are you compliant to work with them in the afterward few weeks so as to lest a government shutdown? There's been talk of a down payment on budget cuts that they would like to make for this year's budget.

And also, I was marveling if you could speak a mini morsel about the offers to get American diplomat Ray Davis freed from Pakistan. Some have criticized the authority for putting pressure too publicly on what is essentially a languid government, and I'm wondering if you could hike us via that process. Thanks.

THE PRESIDENT: My goal is to work with the Republicans, either on the continuing resolution - and for those who are watching that don't know Washingtonese, the CR is a continuing resolution, a path to equitable keep government going when you don't have an overall budcome fromtled. And we didn't bench our overall allowance from last year, so this is carryover (after shift abatement) commerce from last year, funding vital government functions this annual.

So I want to work with everybody, Democrats and Republicans, to get that resolved. I think it is important to make sure that we don't try to make a sequence of symbolic cuts this year that could endanger the recovery. So that's point number one.

What I'm going to be looking for is some common sense that the recovery is still brittle; we passed this tax cut archive precisely to determine that people had more money in their pockets, that their paychecks were larger, were catered these impose honors and stimuli for businesses. But if the steps that we take then prompt thousands of layoffs in state or local government, or core vital functions of government aren't performed properly, well, that could also have a dampening (resurgence, moist) shock on our recovery as well.

So my fathom is going to be are we doing things in a sensible way, meeting core functions, not jeopardizing our recovery. In some cases, like barricade, case in point, Secretary Gates has already testified if we're operating - even operating below the present continuing resolution is putting premonitory strains on our ability to determine our crews have what they need to perform their missions in Afghanistan. Further slashes would hurt our ability to encounter our mission.

And so we've got to be scrupulous. Again, let's use a scalpel; let's no use a machete (cutlass, machete). And whether we do that, there ought be not reason by entire for a government shutdown. And I muse human should be careful almost creature also loose in terms of talking about a government shutdown, for this has - this namely no one preoccupation. People don't get their Social Security checks. They don't get their veterans remittances. Basic functions shut down. And it - that, also, would have a detrimental efficacy ashore our economy recovery. It would be destabilizing at the peak of while, I calculate, everyone is hopeful that we can begin growing this economy quicker.

So I'm looking forward to having a conversation. But the key here is for people to be practical and not to score political points. That's true for all of us. And I think if we take that approximate we can navigate the situation short term and then deal with the problem long term.

With respect to Mr. Davis, our diplomat in Pakistan, we've got a very uncomplicated principle here that every nation in the world that is celebration to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations is - has upheld in the elapse and should uphold in the future, and that is if our diplomats are in different country , then they are not subject to that country's local prosecution (prosecution, prosecution).

We respect it with respect to diplomats who are here. We anticipate Pakistan, that's a signatory and acknowledge Mr. Davis as a ambassador, to abide at the same convention.

And the reason this is an important principle is if it starts being just game on our ambassadors around the world, including in dangerous locations, where we may have inconsistencies with those governments, and our ambassadors or our assorted legation workers are having to convey tough messages to countries where we disagree with them on X, Y, Z, and they start being vulnerable to prosecution locally, that's untenable. It manner they can't do their job. And that's why we respect these conventions, and every country should as well.

So we're working to be chronic to go with the Pakistani government to get this person unlocked. And apparently chapter of - for those who aren't familiar with the backdrop on this, a couple of Pakistanis were annihilated in a episode among Mr. Davis among - in Pakistan. So apparently, we're concerned about the wastage of life. We're not unfeeling about that. But there'sa broader conviction at peg that I think we must uphold.

Q ; How solemn have your threats been to the Pakistani government if they don't hand him over?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm not going to discuss the characteristic commutes that we've had. But we've been very tight about this being an important precedence.

Ed Henry.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. I ambition to go behind to Egypt because there was some prescience around the globe that perhaps you were too careful during that crisis and were kind of a step back the protesters. I know that, as you said, there was dramatic change in three weeks, and some of us wanted it to go even faster than that. But having said that, I accomplish it'sa difficult location. It was evolving rapidly. But now as these protests grow throughout the Mideast and North Africa - - you said ahead your message to the governments contained was make sure you're not violent with peaceable protesters. But what's your message to the protesters? Do you want them to savor liberty? Or do you want them to taste freedom only if it will also bring reliability to our interests in the region?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, at first Dirk Nowitzki Jersey, without revisiting all the events over the last three weeks, I think history will bring an end to ... recording that at every juncture in the situation in Egypt that we were on the right side of history. What we didn't do was masquerade that we could charge the outcome in Egypt, because we can't. So we were very circumspect that it was essential for this to remain an Egyptian accident; that the United States did not become the publish, but that we sent out a very explicit message that we trusted in an orderly transition, a meaningful transition, and a transition that needed to occur not later, but sooner. And we were loyal on that message throughout.

Particularly if you look at my statements, I started talking about reform two weeks or two-and-a -half weeks before Mr. Mubarak ultimately stepped down. And at each juncture I think we calibrated it all but right. And I would recommend that part of the test is that what we ended up penetrating was a peaceful transition, relatively little violence, and relatively little, if any, anti-American sentiment, or anti-Israel emotion, or anti-Western emotion (feeling, emotion). And I think that testifies the fact that in a complicated situation, we got it about right.

My message I think to demonstrators going forward is your ambitions for greater opportunity, for the ability to speak your idea, for a free reception, those are indeed aspirations we support.

< p> As was true in Egypt, ultimately what happens in each of these countries will be determined by the inhabitants of those countries. And even as we uphold these global merits LeBron James Jersey, we do want to make sure that transitions do not degenerate into confusion and violence. That's not just agreeable for us; it's good for those countries. The history of successful transitions to democracy have generally been ones in which peaceful protests led to dialogue, led to discussion, led to reform , and ultimately led to democracy.

And that's true in countries like Eastern Europe. That was also true in countries like Indonesia, a majority Muslim country that went through some of these alike transitions but didn & rsquo ; t all over doing it in such a chaotic (chaotic) vogue that it finished up dividing the societies fundamentally.